The Abnormal Female (1969) is included on a Something Weird triple-header DVD along with Ted V. Mikels’ One Shocking Moment and the truly bizarre The Maidens of Fetish Street. The three movies are by no means the cream of the crop as far as 1960s American sexploitation films are concerned, in fact far from it, but they do provide a look at some of the oddities spawned by this fascinating genre.
The credited director on The Abnormal Female is George Rodgers, with the screenplay credited to Martin Lathrop. This movie is the sole movie credit for both these guys but it was pretty common practice to make movies such as this using pseudonyms so there’s probably no way of knowing who actually made this film.
The Abnormal Female dispenses with plot altogether. The idea is that there’s this psychiatrist who is treating a bunch of women for severe sexual dysfunctions. The women’s stories are then presented to us in flashbacks.
These women are so sexually perverted and dysfunctional that they actually enjoy sex. They clearly need a psychiatrist to teach them to become normal women, in other words to stop enjoying sex. This may well have been an intentional joke on the part of the film-makers. The sexploitation film scene was after all not just a money-making activity. There was, on the part of at least some of the people involved, that they were reacting against the puritanism of Eisenhower-era America and pushing the boundaries of what was considered acceptable entertainment.
You do have to remember the historical context. Just ten years earlier Hollywood movies were showing married couples sleeping in separate beds and a mere glimpse of a nipple was considered to be disgustingly pornographic. It was only in 1959 that it became possible for erotic movies to be made reasonably openly without the film-makers facing the prospect of imprisonment for obscenity. Even in the 60s it was necessary to be extremely careful.
It’s startling just how quickly American sexploitation movies evolved. In 1959 Russ Meyer made the first nudie-cutie (the delightfully good-natured The Immoral Mr Teas). At that time you could show T&A but you couldn’t even hint at actual sexual activity. You had to find a way to present naked girls in a totally non-sexual context. By 1969 you could make a movie like The Abnormal Female, with lots of female frontal nudity and some pretty graphic simulated sex scenes. It’s much more graphic than similar movies made a year or two earlier.
So back to the movie itself. The good doctor’s first patient is a sadist. She gets off on whipping her boyfriend and subjecting him to horrors like the lemon juice torture. Yes, I also had no idea that it was possible to have a lemon juice fetish. She’s the only patient who engages in sex that could be seriously described as kinky.
The second patient’s perversion is that she has sex with a man who isn’t her husband. That’s bad enough but her real perversion is that she enjoys it.
The other patents are into things like threesomes and casual sex. You know, shocking stuff like picking guys up in bars and taking them home. One girl is so twisted that she has sex with a guy in the back seat of a car. I honestly had no idea that a woman could be so depraved.
What you always hope for in classic American sexploitation movies are wtf moments and this movie does have a few (such as the aforementioned lemon juice thing). What really makes this movie weirdly intriguing is the bizarre tone. We have girls who are having sex and they look like they’re thinking about what colour the new curtains for the living room should be. Or the girls look vaguely confused. Or just bored. It’s as if the director forget to tell them to look like they were enjoying sex and it didn’t occur to the actresses themselves.
One thing that has to be said is that the women in this movie are definitely attractive. And they get very naked very frequently.
The highlight for me was the discotheque scene. This girl is cruising for men and she joins a guy on the dance floor. This discotheque has a dance floor that could best be described as intimate. It’s about the size of a living room in a very small apartment. In fact I’m pretty sure the scene actually was shot in the living room of a very small apartment. The dance floor is crowded with couples. OK, it’s not that crowded. There’s a grand total of one couple. Which is just as well. There wouldn’t have been room for two. And paying extras would have blown the budget which, let’s face it, may have amounted to a few hundred dollars.
There are much much better sexploitation movies than this one. The sex scenes manage to be moderately explicit but oddly un-erotic, although the very lack of eroticism is perhaps bizarrely erotic (it depends on your tastes).
The transfer is rather good. Something Weird really had a knack for finding decent quality prints (and often the original negatives) of movies such as this that had been long forgotten.
And you do get three movies plus some typically odd but amusing Something Weird extras.
Tragically these Something Weird releases are becoming hard to find.
The Abnormal Female is a movie best enjoyed with lots of beers and lots of popcorn.
Horror, sci-fi, exploitation, erotica, B-movies, art-house films. Vampires, sex, monsters, all the fun stuff.
Thursday, 29 December 2022
Monday, 26 December 2022
Earth Girls Are Easy (1988)
It’s a shocking admission to have to make but I had never seen Earth Girls Are Easy. I know, one of the most culturally significant motion pictures of the 80s has somehow passed me by. Until now.
Valerie (Geena Davis) is a manicurist. She lives in the Valley. She is facing a huge personal crisis. She and her doctor boyfriend Ted haven’t had sex for two weeks. Two whole weeks. Two long long weeks. Valerie is frantic. Especially given that they’re about to get married.
Her friend Candy (Julie Brown) has the answer - a makeover. To Candy a makeover is the answer to every problem. Valerie goes blonde, she looks absolutely gorgeous and she pus on some very sexy lingerie. If this doesn’t break her sex drought nothing will. Unfortunately it all goes horribly wrong. Valerie is all set for some steamy times with Ted but Ted (who doesn’t know she’s home) arrives home with another woman. Will all the silliness in this movie the most implausible thing is that a man who has Geena Davis ready to rip his trousers off would chase other women.
Valerie is devastated but the following day something happens that gives her something else to think about. Three furry aliens crash-land their spaceship in her swimming pool. The three aliens had been heading to Earth in search of women. They’ve been in space a long time. They’re suffering as much as Valerie from a sex drought.
Valerie handles the situation pretty well. Compared to finding Ted with another woman having aliens land in her pool seems to her like a minor crisis. And they’re very friendly aliens. They’re kinda sweet.
But there is one thing she’s going to have to do. She’s going to have to make them look human. She’ll need Candy’s help. These aliens are going to need heavy-duty makeovers but fortunately Candy is equal to the task. The aliens now look quite human so Candy figures it would be cool to take them nightclubbing. The trouble is that the aliens look human but they don’t behave like humans. They’re also incredibly horny so once they catch sight of a nightclub full of girls they won’t be easy to control.
They get more and more out of control and much craziness ensues. Valerie finally breaks her sex drought. OK, it was with an alien, but when a girl needs some loving what can she do? And she certainly enjoys it.
She can’t quite get Ted out of her mind. Maybe she should forgive him? A weird romantic triangle is developing between Valerie, Ted and the alien leader Mac (Jeff Goldblum). Meanwhile the other two aliens, Wiploc and Zeebo, head off to the beach with the zonked-out surfer dude pool guy Woody (Valerie has to have her swimming pool drained because there’s a spaceship in it). Woody has told them that there are lots of girls at the beach. They naturally cause mayhem.
This is not just a science fiction comedy, it’s a science fiction comedy romance musical. The music is of course very 80s but if you love 80s music you’ll be totally blissed out. I certainly enjoyed the music.
This is an 80s movie on steroids. I suppose you could see it as a gentle satire on the shallowness of American culture but it’s all done in a very light and good-natured way. It might be send up 80s pop culture but it’s doing it with love. Mostly it’s just a movie that wants to have fun.
The musical interludes are fun, with the ’Cause I’m a Blonde number being a highlight.
Geena Davis is gorgeous and bubbly and adorable, and she’s very funny. Jeff Goldblum is good if rather restrained as the alien spaceship commander Mac. He’s the only member of the alien trio who has any sense of responsibility. Goldblum and Geena Davis have to do at least a little bit of serious acting as well as being funny and they manage it extremely well.
I find that a little bit of Jim Carrey goes a long way but his comedic style is well suited to the material here. Add Damon Wayams and you’ve got three likeable if troublesome aliens. Michael McKean almost steals the picture as the surfer pool guy Woody.
Earth Girls Are Easy was a box office flop at the time. I guess it was just too relentlessly quirky. Since then it’s built up a definite cult following. Apart from its other attractions it offers 80s nostalgia overload. Surprisingly it hasn’t had a Blu-Ry release. This needs to happen. It does however look quite OK on DVD, in a perfectly acceptable 16:9 enhanced transfer. There’s not a lot in the way of extras.
This is a very very silly very goofy movie but it’s genuinely funny and it has plenty of charm and it’s romantic in an offbeat way. Comedy is always a matter of taste and it’s a movie you’ll either love or hate. I loved it. Highly recommended.
Valerie (Geena Davis) is a manicurist. She lives in the Valley. She is facing a huge personal crisis. She and her doctor boyfriend Ted haven’t had sex for two weeks. Two whole weeks. Two long long weeks. Valerie is frantic. Especially given that they’re about to get married.
Her friend Candy (Julie Brown) has the answer - a makeover. To Candy a makeover is the answer to every problem. Valerie goes blonde, she looks absolutely gorgeous and she pus on some very sexy lingerie. If this doesn’t break her sex drought nothing will. Unfortunately it all goes horribly wrong. Valerie is all set for some steamy times with Ted but Ted (who doesn’t know she’s home) arrives home with another woman. Will all the silliness in this movie the most implausible thing is that a man who has Geena Davis ready to rip his trousers off would chase other women.
Valerie is devastated but the following day something happens that gives her something else to think about. Three furry aliens crash-land their spaceship in her swimming pool. The three aliens had been heading to Earth in search of women. They’ve been in space a long time. They’re suffering as much as Valerie from a sex drought.
Valerie handles the situation pretty well. Compared to finding Ted with another woman having aliens land in her pool seems to her like a minor crisis. And they’re very friendly aliens. They’re kinda sweet.
But there is one thing she’s going to have to do. She’s going to have to make them look human. She’ll need Candy’s help. These aliens are going to need heavy-duty makeovers but fortunately Candy is equal to the task. The aliens now look quite human so Candy figures it would be cool to take them nightclubbing. The trouble is that the aliens look human but they don’t behave like humans. They’re also incredibly horny so once they catch sight of a nightclub full of girls they won’t be easy to control.
They get more and more out of control and much craziness ensues. Valerie finally breaks her sex drought. OK, it was with an alien, but when a girl needs some loving what can she do? And she certainly enjoys it.
She can’t quite get Ted out of her mind. Maybe she should forgive him? A weird romantic triangle is developing between Valerie, Ted and the alien leader Mac (Jeff Goldblum). Meanwhile the other two aliens, Wiploc and Zeebo, head off to the beach with the zonked-out surfer dude pool guy Woody (Valerie has to have her swimming pool drained because there’s a spaceship in it). Woody has told them that there are lots of girls at the beach. They naturally cause mayhem.
This is not just a science fiction comedy, it’s a science fiction comedy romance musical. The music is of course very 80s but if you love 80s music you’ll be totally blissed out. I certainly enjoyed the music.
This is an 80s movie on steroids. I suppose you could see it as a gentle satire on the shallowness of American culture but it’s all done in a very light and good-natured way. It might be send up 80s pop culture but it’s doing it with love. Mostly it’s just a movie that wants to have fun.
The musical interludes are fun, with the ’Cause I’m a Blonde number being a highlight.
Geena Davis is gorgeous and bubbly and adorable, and she’s very funny. Jeff Goldblum is good if rather restrained as the alien spaceship commander Mac. He’s the only member of the alien trio who has any sense of responsibility. Goldblum and Geena Davis have to do at least a little bit of serious acting as well as being funny and they manage it extremely well.
I find that a little bit of Jim Carrey goes a long way but his comedic style is well suited to the material here. Add Damon Wayams and you’ve got three likeable if troublesome aliens. Michael McKean almost steals the picture as the surfer pool guy Woody.
Earth Girls Are Easy was a box office flop at the time. I guess it was just too relentlessly quirky. Since then it’s built up a definite cult following. Apart from its other attractions it offers 80s nostalgia overload. Surprisingly it hasn’t had a Blu-Ry release. This needs to happen. It does however look quite OK on DVD, in a perfectly acceptable 16:9 enhanced transfer. There’s not a lot in the way of extras.
This is a very very silly very goofy movie but it’s genuinely funny and it has plenty of charm and it’s romantic in an offbeat way. Comedy is always a matter of taste and it’s a movie you’ll either love or hate. I loved it. Highly recommended.
Saturday, 24 December 2022
The Fourth Victim (1971)
The Fourth Victim is a giallo which stars Carroll Baker, and that in itself is surely enough reason to give it a watch.
It is not however quite so simple. This is one of those movies you can bring up whenever you get enticed into one of those “is it a genuine giallo or not” discussions. There are those who are happy to describe any stylish European murder mystery thriller made between around 1968 and 1978 as a giallo. In that sense The Fourth Victim certainly qualifies. Purists on the other hand expect a true giallo to include a number of key ingredients which this movie lacks.
The Fourth Victim is also not an Italian film. It’s a Spanish-Italian co-production and it was directed by a Spaniard, Eugenio Martín. Giallo purists tend to consider the giallo to be a distinctively Italian genre (although there certainly are non-Italian films which satisfy all the necessary giallo criteria).
The Fourth Victim boasts a fine opening sequence which is guaranteed to get the audience intrigued. A beautiful blonde girl is lazing in the pool, reclining in one of those transparent inflatable floating chair things which you tend to see a lot of movies of this era. She is smoking a cigarette. All very innocent, until you notice that the cigarette has burnt all the way down to her fingers and she hasn’t reacted. Maybe she’s asleep? But of course she isn’t asleep.
We discover that the woman is a Mrs Anderson and by the time her husband Arthur Anderson (Michael Craig) arrives home she is floating face down in the pool, very dead. Then things get a bit strange. Before calling the police Anderson and the housekeeper dry off the body, dry off her hair, remove her bathing suit and dress her. The doctor arrives and is quite happy to sign the death certificate.
The insurance company which insured the life of the late Mrs Anderson is not at all happy. This is the third wife that Arthur Henderson has lost. All three died in accidents. All three were heavily insured. Superintendent Dunphy of Scotland Yard is not happy either (the movie is set in England). Henderson is charged with murder, but acquitted. This all happens within the first few minutes so I’m not giving away any vital spoilers.
The twist is that we, the audience, have absolutely no idea if Arthur Anderson is guilty or not. The circumstances of his wife’s death were a bit suspicious but there is no real evidence of his guilt.
Then Julie Spencer (Carroll Baker) enters the picture. While looking at slides of his late wife diving into the pool he hears a splash which sounds exactly like a woman diving into a swimming pool. It is a woman diving into a swimming pool. His swimming pool. It turns out to be a neighbour, the aforementioned Julie Spencer. While Arthur has been away she has been sneaking into his property to use the pool.
Julie seems keen to get to know Anderson better. Anderson isn’t a complete fool. It crosses his mind that she could be a cop or an insurance investigator or a journalist. But she is a beautiful fascinating woman. Is she going to be wife number four?
And who is the mysterious blonde woman hanging around Julie’s house? In fact there are several mysterious blondes in this movie.
Michael Craig is a fine actor. He was nominated for an Oscar, but oddly enough as a writer rather than as an actor. He gives a nicely understated performance. He keeps us off balance - we can’t decide what to make of Arthur Anderson.
Carroll Baker did her best work as an actress in European movies in the late 60s and the 70s. She was perfect for these kinds of movies. Like Michael Craig she is able to keep us off balance.
So we have two protagonists, both likeable and sympathetic, but either one could be hiding a dark secret.
The screenplay by Vicente Coello, Santiago Moncada and Sabatino Ciuffini is equally effective at keeping us guessing. We get a whole succession of plot twists and they’re managed very skilfully with some nice misdirection.
There are dangerous games being played but we don’t know what the games are or how many players there are. The one thing we’re sure of is that we can’t be sure of anything.
Eugenio Martín wasn’t a director who specialised in a particular genre which possibly explains why he hasn’t gained major cult status. I’ve seen three of his movies now and they’re all excellent so you can class me as an admirer of his work. He made a number of interesting and excellent movies in the early 70s. Horror Express is his best-known work but A Candle for the Devil (1973) is every bit as good.
The Fourth Victim doesn’t have the extreme stylistic flourishes that you would expect to see in a giallo but Eugenio Martín isn’t interested in wowing us with visual extravagances. It’s a handsome movie and by no means entirely lacking in style but the director is mostly concerned with creating an atmosphere of doubt and suspicion and in keeping us interested in the two enigmatic protagonists.
This film was made at a time when Spanish censorship was pretty strict so there’s no sex and no nudity. There’s also no gore. On the other hand it’s fast-paced and has a nicely devious plot.
Severin’s release (it’s on DVD and Blu-Ray) offers a pretty nice transfer. The main extra is an interview with Eugenio Martín’s biographer Carlos Aguilar.
The Fourth Victim is only mildly giallo-esque but it’s a well-crafted twisty psychological thriller and it’s thoroughly enjoyable. Add the fine performances by Michael Craig and Carroll Baker and this one gets a highly recommended rating. It would make a nice double bill with the slightly earlier Carroll Baker giallo-esque thriller, The Sweet Body of Deborah (1968).
It is not however quite so simple. This is one of those movies you can bring up whenever you get enticed into one of those “is it a genuine giallo or not” discussions. There are those who are happy to describe any stylish European murder mystery thriller made between around 1968 and 1978 as a giallo. In that sense The Fourth Victim certainly qualifies. Purists on the other hand expect a true giallo to include a number of key ingredients which this movie lacks.
The Fourth Victim is also not an Italian film. It’s a Spanish-Italian co-production and it was directed by a Spaniard, Eugenio Martín. Giallo purists tend to consider the giallo to be a distinctively Italian genre (although there certainly are non-Italian films which satisfy all the necessary giallo criteria).
The Fourth Victim boasts a fine opening sequence which is guaranteed to get the audience intrigued. A beautiful blonde girl is lazing in the pool, reclining in one of those transparent inflatable floating chair things which you tend to see a lot of movies of this era. She is smoking a cigarette. All very innocent, until you notice that the cigarette has burnt all the way down to her fingers and she hasn’t reacted. Maybe she’s asleep? But of course she isn’t asleep.
We discover that the woman is a Mrs Anderson and by the time her husband Arthur Anderson (Michael Craig) arrives home she is floating face down in the pool, very dead. Then things get a bit strange. Before calling the police Anderson and the housekeeper dry off the body, dry off her hair, remove her bathing suit and dress her. The doctor arrives and is quite happy to sign the death certificate.
The insurance company which insured the life of the late Mrs Anderson is not at all happy. This is the third wife that Arthur Henderson has lost. All three died in accidents. All three were heavily insured. Superintendent Dunphy of Scotland Yard is not happy either (the movie is set in England). Henderson is charged with murder, but acquitted. This all happens within the first few minutes so I’m not giving away any vital spoilers.
The twist is that we, the audience, have absolutely no idea if Arthur Anderson is guilty or not. The circumstances of his wife’s death were a bit suspicious but there is no real evidence of his guilt.
Then Julie Spencer (Carroll Baker) enters the picture. While looking at slides of his late wife diving into the pool he hears a splash which sounds exactly like a woman diving into a swimming pool. It is a woman diving into a swimming pool. His swimming pool. It turns out to be a neighbour, the aforementioned Julie Spencer. While Arthur has been away she has been sneaking into his property to use the pool.
Julie seems keen to get to know Anderson better. Anderson isn’t a complete fool. It crosses his mind that she could be a cop or an insurance investigator or a journalist. But she is a beautiful fascinating woman. Is she going to be wife number four?
And who is the mysterious blonde woman hanging around Julie’s house? In fact there are several mysterious blondes in this movie.
Michael Craig is a fine actor. He was nominated for an Oscar, but oddly enough as a writer rather than as an actor. He gives a nicely understated performance. He keeps us off balance - we can’t decide what to make of Arthur Anderson.
Carroll Baker did her best work as an actress in European movies in the late 60s and the 70s. She was perfect for these kinds of movies. Like Michael Craig she is able to keep us off balance.
So we have two protagonists, both likeable and sympathetic, but either one could be hiding a dark secret.
The screenplay by Vicente Coello, Santiago Moncada and Sabatino Ciuffini is equally effective at keeping us guessing. We get a whole succession of plot twists and they’re managed very skilfully with some nice misdirection.
There are dangerous games being played but we don’t know what the games are or how many players there are. The one thing we’re sure of is that we can’t be sure of anything.
Eugenio Martín wasn’t a director who specialised in a particular genre which possibly explains why he hasn’t gained major cult status. I’ve seen three of his movies now and they’re all excellent so you can class me as an admirer of his work. He made a number of interesting and excellent movies in the early 70s. Horror Express is his best-known work but A Candle for the Devil (1973) is every bit as good.
The Fourth Victim doesn’t have the extreme stylistic flourishes that you would expect to see in a giallo but Eugenio Martín isn’t interested in wowing us with visual extravagances. It’s a handsome movie and by no means entirely lacking in style but the director is mostly concerned with creating an atmosphere of doubt and suspicion and in keeping us interested in the two enigmatic protagonists.
This film was made at a time when Spanish censorship was pretty strict so there’s no sex and no nudity. There’s also no gore. On the other hand it’s fast-paced and has a nicely devious plot.
Severin’s release (it’s on DVD and Blu-Ray) offers a pretty nice transfer. The main extra is an interview with Eugenio Martín’s biographer Carlos Aguilar.
The Fourth Victim is only mildly giallo-esque but it’s a well-crafted twisty psychological thriller and it’s thoroughly enjoyable. Add the fine performances by Michael Craig and Carroll Baker and this one gets a highly recommended rating. It would make a nice double bill with the slightly earlier Carroll Baker giallo-esque thriller, The Sweet Body of Deborah (1968).
Thursday, 22 December 2022
Perils of Nyoka (movie serial, 1942)
Perils of Nyoka (AKA Nyoka and the Tigermen) is a 15-part 1942 Republic serial directed by William Witney. Republic’s serials were almost always very good but the ones directed by Witney were very very good indeed.
This is a top-notch serial and it’s consistently entertaining. It contains absolutely everything you could want in a serial and all the ingredients are blended perfectly. Immense fun.
My full review can be found at Classic Movie Ramblings.
This is a top-notch serial and it’s consistently entertaining. It contains absolutely everything you could want in a serial and all the ingredients are blended perfectly. Immense fun.
My full review can be found at Classic Movie Ramblings.
Monday, 19 December 2022
Logan’s Run (1976)
Logan’s Run was released in 1976. It came towards the end of the golden age of science fiction movies which began with the release of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey. It was an era of big-budget major studio science fiction films that aimed to be more than just space operas. They tried to address big ideas and big issues, things like the meaning of life, the destiny of our species, what it means to be human. This era produced movies like Colossus: The Forbin Project, Silent Running, Westworld, Soylent Green and Demon Seed - movies that were noticeably lacking in space battles and laser pistols.
These were Hollywood movies but other countries made similar movies. There were Soviet movies like Solaris and British movies like A Clockwork Orange.
It was an era which came to an end with Star Wars. After that the studios wanted space operas.
Logan’s Run was based on a novel by William F. Nolan.
There’s been a catastrophe brought about by overpopulation (an obsession in the 1970s) and pollution. In response an immense domed city has been constructed. It is a self-contained world, totally isolated from the world outside. The people inside the city believe there is nothing outside the city. The citizens of the city have everything provided for them and their lives revolve around pleasure. There’s just one minor drawback to life in the city. It ends at the age of 30. There’s not a single person over that age in the city.
When someone reaches the age of 30 they undergo the ritual of the Carousel. They are vaporised but it is not necessarily death. Those who are worthy go through renewal. They are reborn.
At least that’s what everyone in the city believes. That’s what Logan 5 (Michael York) believes.
A very small number of misfits refuse to go to the Carousel. They try to escape from the city. They are known as Runners. They are invariably caught and terminated by the Sandmen.
Logan is a Sandman. Logan is 26. He has four years to go but he isn’t worried. He has absolute confidence that, as a Sandman, he will be renewed when he reaches 30.
Everything changes for Logan when he meets Jessica 6 (Jenny Agutter). He’s in the mood for sex so he picks a girl from the Circuit. It’s a kind of hook-up thing. There’s no emotional involvement, just sex. Nobody in the city wants emotional involvement. They just want pleasure. Logan is therefore very surprised when Jessica refuses to have sex with him. And he’s disturbed by some of the things she says. She seems to be sceptical of the whole renewal thing. She wears a medallion in the form of an ankh.
Logan then gets an important assignment. He is to penetrate an organisation that assists Runners. The ankh is the symbol of that organisation. The organisation helps Runners to find a place called Sanctuary. Logan is to pose as a Runner. While being briefed for his mission by the central computer Logan learns some horrifying facts.
Through Jessica Logan hopes to contact the Sanctuary organisation but things get very complicated for him. He discovers feelings that he didn’t know he was capable of. He discovers feelings that he didn’t know anybody was capable of. He ends up playing a dangerous game, a game which involves multiple levels of betrayal. He discovers that there is a world outside the city but to which world does he belong? Does he he belong to either world? And he has to decide what to do about Jessica 6.
He also has to decide what to do about Francis 7. Francis is a fellow Sandman and is Logan’s closest friend but if Logan is a Runner Francis will try to hunt him down.
There’s a surprising amount of emotional nuance in this movie. Logan is torn in his loyalties. He has to betray everything in which he has always believed or he has to betray the Sanctuary people whom he has persuaded to trust him. He he has to betray Francis or betray Jessica. He doesn’t know which of these choices he will make. When he tells Jessica he is a Runner and wants her help in finding Sanctuary he is lying to her. Logan however is already having doubts about the things he has always believed in. And now he finds himself experiencing very strange feelings towards Jessica. He doesn’t just want to sleep with her. He wants to be with her all the time and protect her and spend his life with her. This is love, but to Logan (who has been brought up to believe that the only possible relationship between a man and a woman is a sexual one) it seems like a bizarre perversion.
Jessica has some complexity as well. The idea of love is as novel to her as it is to Logan. There is also the question of whether she can trust him. She is also not at all certain if she wants to stay in the city where everything is familiar or venture into a strange and terrifying thing called the outside world. The very idea of not being in the city terrifies her.
There’s also an ideological dimension to the world. The city is a classic utopia which is really a dystopia. It’s a totalitarian society. No dissent whatever is allowed. Children are thoroughly indoctrinated into a set of beliefs. Logan for example is genuinely shocked when he picks Jessica up on Circuit and she refuses to have sex with him. It’s not that he’s upset about being sexually rejected. He simply cannot imagine anyone turning down the chance of casual sex. Only a misfit or a dangerous rebel would do anything so outlandish.
It’s interesting that Logan’s motivations are entirely personal. He doesn’t have a sudden ideological conversion. He never does express any interest in the welfare of society. He cares about his individual happiness and he comes to care about one individual woman. We have to decide if he’s right - if the happiness of individuals is more important than the welfare of the state.
Logan’s Run also offers plenty of action, and the action scenes are excellent.
The film ran into major censorship problems. There is some nudity but originally there was a lot more. The studio insisted it be cut to get a PG rating. The scenes of people getting blown to bits were of course no problem in that respect. That’s just good clean family fun. But nudity is of course shocking and horrifying and the censors weren’t about to let impressionable young people get a glimpse of the naked female body.
It’s a beautifully shot movie (with Ernest Laszlo doing the cinematography). The city is all bright colours and everything is clean and sparkling and excessively cheerful. It’s like a gigantic shopping mall. Once Logan makes his run we get to see plenty of grime and squalor. The special effects were absolutely cutting edge in 1976 and they’re great fun to watch today. A lot of money was spent on this movie and it shows.
The Blu-Ray release include an informative audio commentary (apparently dating from the 90s) with director Michael Anderson, star Michael York and costume designer Bill Thomas. There’s also a documentary on the film.
Logan’s Run has its problems. There are some plot points that stretch credibility. While I love the look of the movie it does look more like the 1970s than the 23rd century. It drags badly in the third quarter. The ending however is quite good. Some criticisms by modern reviewers are a bit unfair. The city does look like a shopping mall, but for me that works. And that’s the future we ended up getting - a society that revolves around shopping. The city is vulgar and garish, but again the movie was quite prescient. And it’s the last of the line of late 60s/early 70s major studio sci-fi films aimed at a grown-up audience. After Star Wars grown-up sci-fi movies would be few are far between. Highly recommended.
These were Hollywood movies but other countries made similar movies. There were Soviet movies like Solaris and British movies like A Clockwork Orange.
It was an era which came to an end with Star Wars. After that the studios wanted space operas.
Logan’s Run was based on a novel by William F. Nolan.
There’s been a catastrophe brought about by overpopulation (an obsession in the 1970s) and pollution. In response an immense domed city has been constructed. It is a self-contained world, totally isolated from the world outside. The people inside the city believe there is nothing outside the city. The citizens of the city have everything provided for them and their lives revolve around pleasure. There’s just one minor drawback to life in the city. It ends at the age of 30. There’s not a single person over that age in the city.
When someone reaches the age of 30 they undergo the ritual of the Carousel. They are vaporised but it is not necessarily death. Those who are worthy go through renewal. They are reborn.
At least that’s what everyone in the city believes. That’s what Logan 5 (Michael York) believes.
A very small number of misfits refuse to go to the Carousel. They try to escape from the city. They are known as Runners. They are invariably caught and terminated by the Sandmen.
Logan is a Sandman. Logan is 26. He has four years to go but he isn’t worried. He has absolute confidence that, as a Sandman, he will be renewed when he reaches 30.
Everything changes for Logan when he meets Jessica 6 (Jenny Agutter). He’s in the mood for sex so he picks a girl from the Circuit. It’s a kind of hook-up thing. There’s no emotional involvement, just sex. Nobody in the city wants emotional involvement. They just want pleasure. Logan is therefore very surprised when Jessica refuses to have sex with him. And he’s disturbed by some of the things she says. She seems to be sceptical of the whole renewal thing. She wears a medallion in the form of an ankh.
Logan then gets an important assignment. He is to penetrate an organisation that assists Runners. The ankh is the symbol of that organisation. The organisation helps Runners to find a place called Sanctuary. Logan is to pose as a Runner. While being briefed for his mission by the central computer Logan learns some horrifying facts.
Through Jessica Logan hopes to contact the Sanctuary organisation but things get very complicated for him. He discovers feelings that he didn’t know he was capable of. He discovers feelings that he didn’t know anybody was capable of. He ends up playing a dangerous game, a game which involves multiple levels of betrayal. He discovers that there is a world outside the city but to which world does he belong? Does he he belong to either world? And he has to decide what to do about Jessica 6.
He also has to decide what to do about Francis 7. Francis is a fellow Sandman and is Logan’s closest friend but if Logan is a Runner Francis will try to hunt him down.
There’s a surprising amount of emotional nuance in this movie. Logan is torn in his loyalties. He has to betray everything in which he has always believed or he has to betray the Sanctuary people whom he has persuaded to trust him. He he has to betray Francis or betray Jessica. He doesn’t know which of these choices he will make. When he tells Jessica he is a Runner and wants her help in finding Sanctuary he is lying to her. Logan however is already having doubts about the things he has always believed in. And now he finds himself experiencing very strange feelings towards Jessica. He doesn’t just want to sleep with her. He wants to be with her all the time and protect her and spend his life with her. This is love, but to Logan (who has been brought up to believe that the only possible relationship between a man and a woman is a sexual one) it seems like a bizarre perversion.
Jessica has some complexity as well. The idea of love is as novel to her as it is to Logan. There is also the question of whether she can trust him. She is also not at all certain if she wants to stay in the city where everything is familiar or venture into a strange and terrifying thing called the outside world. The very idea of not being in the city terrifies her.
There’s also an ideological dimension to the world. The city is a classic utopia which is really a dystopia. It’s a totalitarian society. No dissent whatever is allowed. Children are thoroughly indoctrinated into a set of beliefs. Logan for example is genuinely shocked when he picks Jessica up on Circuit and she refuses to have sex with him. It’s not that he’s upset about being sexually rejected. He simply cannot imagine anyone turning down the chance of casual sex. Only a misfit or a dangerous rebel would do anything so outlandish.
It’s interesting that Logan’s motivations are entirely personal. He doesn’t have a sudden ideological conversion. He never does express any interest in the welfare of society. He cares about his individual happiness and he comes to care about one individual woman. We have to decide if he’s right - if the happiness of individuals is more important than the welfare of the state.
Logan’s Run also offers plenty of action, and the action scenes are excellent.
The film ran into major censorship problems. There is some nudity but originally there was a lot more. The studio insisted it be cut to get a PG rating. The scenes of people getting blown to bits were of course no problem in that respect. That’s just good clean family fun. But nudity is of course shocking and horrifying and the censors weren’t about to let impressionable young people get a glimpse of the naked female body.
It’s a beautifully shot movie (with Ernest Laszlo doing the cinematography). The city is all bright colours and everything is clean and sparkling and excessively cheerful. It’s like a gigantic shopping mall. Once Logan makes his run we get to see plenty of grime and squalor. The special effects were absolutely cutting edge in 1976 and they’re great fun to watch today. A lot of money was spent on this movie and it shows.
The Blu-Ray release include an informative audio commentary (apparently dating from the 90s) with director Michael Anderson, star Michael York and costume designer Bill Thomas. There’s also a documentary on the film.
Logan’s Run has its problems. There are some plot points that stretch credibility. While I love the look of the movie it does look more like the 1970s than the 23rd century. It drags badly in the third quarter. The ending however is quite good. Some criticisms by modern reviewers are a bit unfair. The city does look like a shopping mall, but for me that works. And that’s the future we ended up getting - a society that revolves around shopping. The city is vulgar and garish, but again the movie was quite prescient. And it’s the last of the line of late 60s/early 70s major studio sci-fi films aimed at a grown-up audience. After Star Wars grown-up sci-fi movies would be few are far between. Highly recommended.
Thursday, 15 December 2022
Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade (1978)
Emmanuelle (1974) having been a gigantic hit by the late 70s everyone wanted to jump on the bandwagon. One of the most successful attempts to do so was the Italian Black Emanuelle series. The awesome thing about all these Emanuelle rip-offs (which changed one letter in the heroine’s name to avoid legal problems) is that they had virtually no connection whatsoever with the original movie or the original character, other than the fact that they were skin flicks filmed in exotic settings.
Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade, directed by Joe D’Amato, was the seventh of the Black Emanuelle films. The Black Emanuelle movies made a star out of Indonesian actress Laura Gemser.
In the Black Emanuelle movies Emanuelle, rather than being a French diplomat’s wife, is an investigative photo-journalist. In Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade she’s in Nairobi, trying to get an interview with an Italian gangster named Giorgio Rivetti (Venantino Venantini). Emanuelle has her friend Susan (Ely Galleani) helping her out. Susan likes sex. She likes sex a lot. Her car breaks down a lot but that doesn’t worry her because she knows a really good mechanic. He might not know much about servicing cars but he knows how to service Susan.
Rivetti has some business deal cooking with Prince Arausani (Pierre Marfurt). He’s having trouble getting the prince to close the deal. In exchange for an interview Emanuele agrees to do what she can to persuade the prince to see things Rivetti’s ways. Emanuele is very good at persuading men.
This part of the film is mostly an excuse for some bedroom romps. We also see Emanuele taking a shower with Susan, which provides some of the girl-on-girl action which was obligatory in 70s softcore movies.
Then the real plot of the movie kicks in. Emanuele saw something in Nairobi Airport which intrigued her - a man boarding a plane with a girl in a wheelchair. Shortly afterwards she sees the man and the girl again, but there’s no wheelchair in sight. Emanuele is after all a journlist and she has a good nose for a story. She definitely smells a story here. After doing a bit of digging around she realises she’s stumbled onto a white slavery racket. It’s run by an American businessman, Francis Harley (Gabriele Tinti).
Being an ace girl reporter Emanuele decides to go undercover, posing as an ambitious girl down on her luck who is willing to consider prostitution as a career option.
Emanuele manages to infiltrate a high-class brothel in San Diego. What she really wants to do is to find out what happens in the Annexe - the girls are forbidden to go there so there must be something really shocking going on. Unfortunately Emanuelle gets caught and she’s in danger of being lobotomised.
There are a lot of problems with this movie. The first half hour has no connection whatsoever with the rest of the film. The pacing is slow. The suspenseful parts aren’t very suspenseful. But mostly what’s wrong is that it promises shocking subject matter but it doesn’t deliver. It just isn’t shocking at all. So there’s a high-class prostitution ring. Apparently we’re supposed to be horrified that such things go on. There’s a bit of nastiness but it has no edge to it and makes no impact. We never feel that Emanuele is in real danger.
The impression this movie gives is that no-one involved was all that interested. There’s a noticeable lack of energy. Romano Scandariato should have been told to toss his screenplay out the window and start again.
There’s an astounding amount of female frontal nudity and there are lots of sex scenes. What’s surprising is that the movie doesn’t feel the least bit sleazy. It’s too laid-back. The bits that are supposed to be sleazy fall flat. We feel vaguely that we should be horrified when Emanuele gets raped but the scene lacks impact and five minutes later Emanuele seems to have forgotten all about it.
And when all is said and done the villains don’t seem very villainous. You can’t help feeling that if nosy reporters like Emanuele would stop hassling them they’d just run their fancy brothel without doing any great harm to anybody.
The girls in the brothel seem to be very well paid and rather cheerful. We’re supposed to believe that they’re slaves but they just don’t act like it. They just don’t give the impression that they feel brutalised or exploited. They giggle and gossip a lot. The Italian gangster, Rivetti, seems like a really nice guy. Francis Harley, the chief villain, comes across as a pretty nice guy. Even Madame Claude, who runs the brothel, seems rather pleasant. She’s a lesbian but she’s not a wicked predatory lesbian. She just likes girls.
The Full Moon DVD offers only the English dubbed version and the dubbing is atrocious. That’s obviously not Full Moon’s fault and the transfer is pretty good. This movie was also included in the DVD set from Severin, Black Emanuele’s Box vol 2.
Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade just seems too lighthearted. It delivers plenty of skin but that’s about it. Not worth bothering with unless you’re a Laura Gemser completist.
I reviewed the first movie in this series, Black Emanuelle, years ago. It's also not great. And aeons ago I reviewed Emmanuelle, which really is worth seeing.
Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade, directed by Joe D’Amato, was the seventh of the Black Emanuelle films. The Black Emanuelle movies made a star out of Indonesian actress Laura Gemser.
In the Black Emanuelle movies Emanuelle, rather than being a French diplomat’s wife, is an investigative photo-journalist. In Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade she’s in Nairobi, trying to get an interview with an Italian gangster named Giorgio Rivetti (Venantino Venantini). Emanuelle has her friend Susan (Ely Galleani) helping her out. Susan likes sex. She likes sex a lot. Her car breaks down a lot but that doesn’t worry her because she knows a really good mechanic. He might not know much about servicing cars but he knows how to service Susan.
Rivetti has some business deal cooking with Prince Arausani (Pierre Marfurt). He’s having trouble getting the prince to close the deal. In exchange for an interview Emanuele agrees to do what she can to persuade the prince to see things Rivetti’s ways. Emanuele is very good at persuading men.
This part of the film is mostly an excuse for some bedroom romps. We also see Emanuele taking a shower with Susan, which provides some of the girl-on-girl action which was obligatory in 70s softcore movies.
Then the real plot of the movie kicks in. Emanuele saw something in Nairobi Airport which intrigued her - a man boarding a plane with a girl in a wheelchair. Shortly afterwards she sees the man and the girl again, but there’s no wheelchair in sight. Emanuele is after all a journlist and she has a good nose for a story. She definitely smells a story here. After doing a bit of digging around she realises she’s stumbled onto a white slavery racket. It’s run by an American businessman, Francis Harley (Gabriele Tinti).
Being an ace girl reporter Emanuele decides to go undercover, posing as an ambitious girl down on her luck who is willing to consider prostitution as a career option.
Emanuele manages to infiltrate a high-class brothel in San Diego. What she really wants to do is to find out what happens in the Annexe - the girls are forbidden to go there so there must be something really shocking going on. Unfortunately Emanuelle gets caught and she’s in danger of being lobotomised.
There are a lot of problems with this movie. The first half hour has no connection whatsoever with the rest of the film. The pacing is slow. The suspenseful parts aren’t very suspenseful. But mostly what’s wrong is that it promises shocking subject matter but it doesn’t deliver. It just isn’t shocking at all. So there’s a high-class prostitution ring. Apparently we’re supposed to be horrified that such things go on. There’s a bit of nastiness but it has no edge to it and makes no impact. We never feel that Emanuele is in real danger.
The impression this movie gives is that no-one involved was all that interested. There’s a noticeable lack of energy. Romano Scandariato should have been told to toss his screenplay out the window and start again.
There’s an astounding amount of female frontal nudity and there are lots of sex scenes. What’s surprising is that the movie doesn’t feel the least bit sleazy. It’s too laid-back. The bits that are supposed to be sleazy fall flat. We feel vaguely that we should be horrified when Emanuele gets raped but the scene lacks impact and five minutes later Emanuele seems to have forgotten all about it.
And when all is said and done the villains don’t seem very villainous. You can’t help feeling that if nosy reporters like Emanuele would stop hassling them they’d just run their fancy brothel without doing any great harm to anybody.
The girls in the brothel seem to be very well paid and rather cheerful. We’re supposed to believe that they’re slaves but they just don’t act like it. They just don’t give the impression that they feel brutalised or exploited. They giggle and gossip a lot. The Italian gangster, Rivetti, seems like a really nice guy. Francis Harley, the chief villain, comes across as a pretty nice guy. Even Madame Claude, who runs the brothel, seems rather pleasant. She’s a lesbian but she’s not a wicked predatory lesbian. She just likes girls.
The Full Moon DVD offers only the English dubbed version and the dubbing is atrocious. That’s obviously not Full Moon’s fault and the transfer is pretty good. This movie was also included in the DVD set from Severin, Black Emanuele’s Box vol 2.
Emanuelle and the White Slave Trade just seems too lighthearted. It delivers plenty of skin but that’s about it. Not worth bothering with unless you’re a Laura Gemser completist.
I reviewed the first movie in this series, Black Emanuelle, years ago. It's also not great. And aeons ago I reviewed Emmanuelle, which really is worth seeing.
Tuesday, 13 December 2022
Sorceress (1995)
There have been several movies with the title Sorceress but there are two in particular which are likely to get confused. There’s Jack Hill’s 1982 sword & sorcery flick (which is by the way an excellent fun movie) and there’s the 1995 witchcraft-in-the- modern-world horror film. To add to the confusion the 1982 movie was written by none other than Jim Wynorski, who went on to direct the 1995 movie. The 1995 movie has also been released as Temptress (which was in fact Wynorski's origonal title).
The 1995 flick begins with a naked witch (we soon find out her name is Erica, played by Julie Strain) performing a ritual. Amelia (Linda Blair) is waiting for her husband Howard to get home from work. He doesn’t make it home. Whether Erica is actually responsible for this is not entirely certain but the viewer has very very strong reasons to believe just that. Erica certainly believes it. Erica believes she is a witch.
Amelia is a witch as well. This will be a battle of the witches movie.
Things don’t turn out the way Erica planned. She ends up being the one who is dead.
Erica is (or was) married to Larry Barnes (Larry Poindexter), who works in a top L.A. law firm. Howard is a junior partner in the same firm. Larry had been in love with Carol (Rochelle Swanson) but he married Erica. Erica told him that was because she cast a spell on him. Literally.
Erica is quite generous with Larry. For his birthday she gives him a really thoughtful present - her sister Maria (Toni Naples, who was also executive producer on this film). Larry had always wanted to have sex with Maria and now he can.
Then there’s a murder. Amelia’s gardener Stan is suspected of murdering his while family.
Larry and Carol get back together. Larry feels a bit guilty about this, given that Erica has only been dead a few days, but Carol is hot to trot and now that Erica’s dead he realises it was always Carol he loved.
But Carol starts to behave strangely. She starts to resemble Erica, not just in appearance but in behaviour. Larry is pretty disturbed by this.
Maria tries to warn him that it’s all witchcraft and that it has something to do with a necklace Carol found, a necklace called a glynska.
While the plot pauses regularly to make room for sex scenes (which is not a complaint - the sex scenes are well done and fairly hot) the plot never gets forgotten and a genuine sense of menace starts to build. People start to get killed. The sexual tensions build, and it’s those sexual tensions that cause people to get killed. While there’s plenty of sex it would be incorrect to describe the sex scenes as gratuitous - the plot is driven to a considerable extent by sex.
This is a very woman-centric movie. The men - Larry, Howard, Larry’s buddy Don - are totally passive. It’s women’s jealousies, loves, hatreds, passions and desires that drive the action and the men are powerless.
The acting is, surprisingly perhaps, pretty good. Rochelle Swanson and Toni Naples are extremely good, Julie Strain projects the right sort of seductive evil and it’s always fun to see Linda Blair (and she manages to be chillingly witchy). The male cast members re ll perfectly competent.
Jim Wynorski doesn’t get much respect as a director but he did make a few fun movies, such as Deathstalker II. The fact that he has made so many trashy movies has led a lot of people to dismiss Sorceress as mere trash. It is trash, but it’s good trash. And it’s well-crafted trash. It’s unashamedly an exploitation movie. It’s worth pointing out that Wynorski honed his skills working for Roger Corman and this movie is like Corman’s better efforts - packed with entertainment value, fast-paced and slick. Like Corman Wynorski has the knack of making modestly budgeted movies that are well-made and look more expensive than they are.
Amusingly the house which was used as Larry’s house was actually owned by a bunch of real-life witches.
Synapse have released this movie on Blu-Ry and DVD. This release is the uncensored director-approved cut. The transfer is excellent and there are two audio commentaries.
Sorceress is sexy fun. And it’s also a genuine horror movie. It has acres of female nudity, some genuinely scary moments and plenty of style and energy. Don’t take it too seriously. Just enjoy the ride. Highly recommended.
The 1995 flick begins with a naked witch (we soon find out her name is Erica, played by Julie Strain) performing a ritual. Amelia (Linda Blair) is waiting for her husband Howard to get home from work. He doesn’t make it home. Whether Erica is actually responsible for this is not entirely certain but the viewer has very very strong reasons to believe just that. Erica certainly believes it. Erica believes she is a witch.
Amelia is a witch as well. This will be a battle of the witches movie.
Things don’t turn out the way Erica planned. She ends up being the one who is dead.
Erica is (or was) married to Larry Barnes (Larry Poindexter), who works in a top L.A. law firm. Howard is a junior partner in the same firm. Larry had been in love with Carol (Rochelle Swanson) but he married Erica. Erica told him that was because she cast a spell on him. Literally.
Erica is quite generous with Larry. For his birthday she gives him a really thoughtful present - her sister Maria (Toni Naples, who was also executive producer on this film). Larry had always wanted to have sex with Maria and now he can.
Then there’s a murder. Amelia’s gardener Stan is suspected of murdering his while family.
Larry and Carol get back together. Larry feels a bit guilty about this, given that Erica has only been dead a few days, but Carol is hot to trot and now that Erica’s dead he realises it was always Carol he loved.
But Carol starts to behave strangely. She starts to resemble Erica, not just in appearance but in behaviour. Larry is pretty disturbed by this.
Maria tries to warn him that it’s all witchcraft and that it has something to do with a necklace Carol found, a necklace called a glynska.
While the plot pauses regularly to make room for sex scenes (which is not a complaint - the sex scenes are well done and fairly hot) the plot never gets forgotten and a genuine sense of menace starts to build. People start to get killed. The sexual tensions build, and it’s those sexual tensions that cause people to get killed. While there’s plenty of sex it would be incorrect to describe the sex scenes as gratuitous - the plot is driven to a considerable extent by sex.
This is a very woman-centric movie. The men - Larry, Howard, Larry’s buddy Don - are totally passive. It’s women’s jealousies, loves, hatreds, passions and desires that drive the action and the men are powerless.
The acting is, surprisingly perhaps, pretty good. Rochelle Swanson and Toni Naples are extremely good, Julie Strain projects the right sort of seductive evil and it’s always fun to see Linda Blair (and she manages to be chillingly witchy). The male cast members re ll perfectly competent.
Jim Wynorski doesn’t get much respect as a director but he did make a few fun movies, such as Deathstalker II. The fact that he has made so many trashy movies has led a lot of people to dismiss Sorceress as mere trash. It is trash, but it’s good trash. And it’s well-crafted trash. It’s unashamedly an exploitation movie. It’s worth pointing out that Wynorski honed his skills working for Roger Corman and this movie is like Corman’s better efforts - packed with entertainment value, fast-paced and slick. Like Corman Wynorski has the knack of making modestly budgeted movies that are well-made and look more expensive than they are.
Amusingly the house which was used as Larry’s house was actually owned by a bunch of real-life witches.
Synapse have released this movie on Blu-Ry and DVD. This release is the uncensored director-approved cut. The transfer is excellent and there are two audio commentaries.
Sorceress is sexy fun. And it’s also a genuine horror movie. It has acres of female nudity, some genuinely scary moments and plenty of style and energy. Don’t take it too seriously. Just enjoy the ride. Highly recommended.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)






.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)



.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)





.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)